Built for review teams

Evidence workflows that feel calm, not chaotic.

Insensive is an end-to-end platform for systematic and scoping reviews. Pool references from Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed, run automated bibliometric analyses, and coordinate title/abstract and full-text screening — all inside one shared workspace.

Start with Login Try it Free

Project Control Center

Live

Data Workspace

Pool files once, reuse across projects

Bibliometric Analyses

Run trend and network outputs per project

Systematic Screenings

Invite reviewers and track inclusion decisions

The workflow

From raw exports to review decisions

Four steps that take you from scattered database exports to a fully auditable, team-reviewed evidence base.

Upload & Pool References

Import .csv, .ris, .bib, and .nbib exports from Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed into a central Data Workspace — reusable across any project without re-uploading.

Create a Project

Organize each review around a focused research question. Attach files from the pool or upload project-specific references. Invite collaborators with per-project access.

Run Bibliometric Analysis

Trigger automated analyses and receive citation trend charts, co-authorship networks, keyword co-occurrence maps, and country-level outputs — all bundled into a downloadable PDF report.

Screen with Your Team

Run structured title/abstract and full-text screening rounds. Track each reviewer's inclusion and exclusion decisions in real time, with built-in conflict detection and progress dashboards.

See it in action

Two powerful tools, one workspace

Walk through Insensive's core features to see exactly what your team will work with.

insensive.com/projects/3/bibliometrics/7

Projects / Cardiovascular Review

Bibliometric Analysis #7

Completed ↓ PDF Report

Total Records

1,247

Deduplicated

891

Citations

14,328

Authors

2,106

Publications per Year

2013 2024

Co-authorship Network

847 clusters identified

Top Keywords

heart failure SGLT-2 RCT meta-analysis mortality

Attach your reference files

Upload exports from Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed. Insensive parses and merges them automatically.

Run the analysis

One click queues the job. Citation trends, keyword maps, and co-authorship networks are computed in the background.

Download the report

Get a ready-to-share PDF with all charts and summary tables, or export raw data as a ZIP file.

Try it Free

insensive.com/projects/3/screenings/2/screen

Abstract Screening — Round 1

45 of 120 screened

Comparative efficacy of SGLT-2 inhibitors versus GLP-1 receptor agonists in cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2023

Background: Both SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists have demonstrated cardiovascular benefits in large randomized trials. However, direct comparisons remain limited. Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL for RCTs reporting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)…

SGLT-2 inhibitors cardiovascular meta-analysis

Team decisions on this paper

Reviewer A

Include

Reviewer B

Exclude

You

Deciding…

Conflict detected — needs resolution

Create a screening round

Define whether it's a title/abstract or full-text round. Assign the reference pool and invite your co-reviewers.

Each reviewer screens independently

Papers appear one by one with the full abstract. Reviewers click Include or Exclude — without seeing each other's decisions first.

Resolve conflicts, then export

Disagreements are flagged automatically. Once resolved, export the included set as a reference list for the next round.

Try it Free

Ready to run your next review faster?

From reference ingestion to screening decisions, Insensive keeps your evidence pipeline in sync.